Thursday, October 17, 2019

Stanwood Camano School District


Stanwood Camano School District, director, district 2

Charlotte Murry cmurry74@gmail.com

1.     Why are you running for this particular position?
 I am running for office for several reasons.  I come from a long line of family that believes in civic service, growing up around in that environment, it is part of who I am.  I also believe that if you find problems with something, that you should try and be part of the solution, not just complain about it and hope someone else will fix it. I have 3 children that have been through the Stanwood Camano School district; two that have graduated and one that is still at the high school. Over the years, I have seen really great things and some not so great things. When elected, I would like to move our school district forward; giving all students the best opportunities for a successful future and hopefully fix something of the things that are broken along the way. 

2.     What do you hope to accomplish in this position? 
I would like to have a healthier environment for all of our students and teachers to learn and work in. For our students to feel physically and emotionally safe and appreciated for their individual learning styles and our teachers, who are our eyes and ears, to feel comfortable bringing concerns to administration and working together to find the best solutions for all those involved. Today's schools are very different than anything we have seen in history, having to tackle issues that previous generations would have never ever considered; mass shootings, suicide, cyber-bullying, discrimination, etc. The common theme in many of these issues is mental health. It has to be at the forefront.

3.     What problems do you see that you expect to correct or alleviate?
I believe we have been compliant in coming up with out of the box solutions to issues, making excuses that we don't have the financial resources or other cop outs.  There are many state & federal grants and other resources in the community that I feel we don't take advantage of that could help us with these shortfalls. 

4.     What relevant experience do you have?
I have worked in many fields over the years.  I have extensive background in information technology, construction, healthcare, finance and accounting. Over the years I have been blessed to be in leadership of groups that got together and solve problems for the likes of Microsoft, Amazon, Boeing, Weyerhaeuser, REI and many other organizations in the Puget Sound region. As a member of the Snohomish County Labor Council, I am also very familiar with what it means to bargain in good faith when it comes to our teachers and support staff. As my children have grown, I have been an art docent, PTA member, soccer coach, and the Stanwood High Band Booster President; these experiences have giving me a good insight into our schools and our students. 

5.     What will be your operating philosophy in office?
I have a very strong work ethic and I am very serious about working to find solutions to our school districts issues. Being a school board member is very important and there is a lot at stake for the future of our students, teachers and community.


6.     What message would you like to convey to voters?
I would like the voters to know that I want what is best for our students, teachers and district from an educational and fiscal prospective.  We have a very special multi-generational community full of heritage; where people come back to raise their families. I don't want to lose that. I want to help us build on that and give our students the best education and keys to financial success so they can come back to our area to raise the next generation. 


Keri Maxwell maxwell4510@gmail.com has  withdrawn (per Everett Herald 5-28-19)

Keith Pappas greek31@yahoo.com has withdrawn

Ms Murray is running unopposed, which I did not realize until checking the record. But since she has submitted a response, I thought it only fair to post it.



Stanwood School District, director, district 3

Miranda Evans mevans5426@gmail.com no response  
no information provided to SnoCo sample ballot.

Robert Shelley wobbie@frontier.com withdrawn ( per Everett Herald 5-28-19)

Ms Evans is running unopposed, which I only learned when checking the record.


Stanwood School District, director, district 4

Brett Kinney kinneyb532@gmail.com no response


From SnoCo sample ballot: Elected Experience: PCO Snohomish County LD10

Other Professional Experience: Healthcare Management 10 plus years. Manufacturing Management Industrial and Technology 15 plus years. Business Operations and Human Resource Management 5 years. Small Business Owner and Consultant.

Education: Bachelor of Science Degree in Industrial Technology from Western Washington University.
Associate Degree from Everett Community College.

Community Service: Snohomish County Parks and Recreation Advisory Council 4 years, Member and volunteer for Back Country Horsemen of Washington, Local Church Board Member. Volunteer at Warm Beach Camp. Volunteer on several community service projects for
residents. Service project on School Baseball dugout. Leader for Royal Rangers Scouting program.

Statement: My Name is Brett Kinney and I am running for Stanwood Camano School District 4 Board position. As a member of the Stanwood community for the past 24 years, my wife and I have had the privilege to raise our family in this community and for our children to attend the Stanwood schools.

Having a Bachelor of Science degree in Technology from Western Washington University and working in the business community in a management role for over 20 years, I know first hand how a strong balanced academic education prepares students for the future.

Stanwood/Camano we are privileged to have incredible teachers, administrators, and staff at our schools. If Elected, I will work to ensure that they are held to the highest standards, and will make the success of our students my number one priority. I will be an advocate for students and will work to guarantee that they graduate with the skills needed to be successful in whatever career path they choose.

If Elected, I will work to ensure that our schools in Stanwood will build on its successes of the past, with fiscal responsibility equip our Students and Staff with the resources necessary to prepare for the future.


Ken Christoferson, incumbent kenandbarbara@wavecable.com
  1. 1. Why are you running for this particular position?
I am running for the position because I believe that public education is the best way to create opportunities for our children. We have made a commitment to provide for those who follow, just as people before us did their best for each of us.
  1. 2. What do you hope to accomplish in this position?    
I expect to continue to focus on providing the widest range of programs to suit the full range of student needs.
If an incumbent, what have you accomplished?  Financial  security and support from our voters to allow the building projects and the education programs to have the resources necessary.
  1. 3. What problems do you see that you expect to correct or alleviate?   
I believe that we will be challenged by the 24 credit graduation requirement.  Some of our programs will have to be creative to meet the new requirements and continue to provide career opportunities.

4.What relevant experience do you have? 
 I have served as a school board director for several terms as well as serving as chair of the facility planning committee for 10 years.  I have served as president of the Stanwood Camano Area Foundation,  the Stanwood Lions Club, Our Saviour’s Lutheran Church,  Washington Aggregate and Concrete Association, and serve on the Heat Frost and Insulators Join Apprenticement Committee as well as serving on the Washington State School Directors Association resolution committee for 10 years.

  1. 5. What will be your operating philosophy in office?   
I believe that it is important to listen to everyone when they want to convey a message.  I believe that the board is there to set policy and to review the results of the programs and make changes when necessary to make sure our programs and processes are aligned with our stated mission.

 6.What message would you like to convey to voters?  
I will make decisions that are in the best interests of our children and promise to work hard for each of them.

From SnoCo sample ballot: 
Elected Experience: Two terms as Fire Commissioner District 19, 20 years serving as Stanwood Camano School Board Director

Other Professional Experience: President and Owner Stanwood Redi-Mix Inc. Member and past President of Washington Concrete and Aggregates Assoc. Trustee, Joint Apprenticeship Committee for Heat and Frost Insulators.

Education: No information submitted

Community Service: Member of Our Saviour's Lutheran Church and current President, Member and past President Fritjov Sons of Norway, Past President of Stanwood Lions Club, Former President of Stanwood Camano Area Foundation.
Statement: Thanks for allowing me to serve on the Stanwood Camano School Board. I live in this community where I grew up. I attended our local schools together with my wife as did my children my grandchildren and also my parents, I am appreciative of the community support and will continue the effort to make every possible opportunity available to our children.
Stanwood Camano residents have always provided needed support by voting to build needed building such as the current projects building a new high school and alternative school, Community members also volunteer countless hours to provide needed support for students. The School Board proposed a ballot issue for the project now underway and promised to make sure all the dollars were well spent. I want to honor that promise and commitment and am asking for your vote.
~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~

It took a while to get information on candidate Kinney. Without more information, I am inclined to opt for the incumbent, who seems at least to have a reasonable understanding of the job. If I voted in the Stanwood Camano School district, I would vote for Ken Christoferson.

Stanwood School District, director at large, position 5

Natalie Hagglund.    incumbent nathagglund@hotmail.com
  1. 1. Why are you running for this particular position?
I have enjoyed my term on the school board and believe that I continue to have a valuable perspective.  I am experienced, do my job with integrity, and have relevance for what is happening in our district now. 
2.     What do you hope to accomplish in this position?  If an incumbent, what have you accomplished?
In the time that I have been on the board, eight schools have received awards of recognition, graduation rates and test scores have risen, we have remained financially stable, and are accomplishing wonderful capital projects. Our elementary-aged ASSIST department merged to one location for the benefit of all our students with special needs, we added a behavior program at the middle school level that has been highly successful in getting kids the support needed to manage their classroom time successfully and we have a focus on suicide prevention involving many community partners. The Board implemented an annual Special Board Award to recognize individuals who go above and beyond for our district and we have been able to honor several deserving individuals. I am proud of the work that our District is doing and would like to continue to be part of it.
  1. 3. What problems do you see that you expect to correct or alleviate?
The School Board is a cooperation. Directors do not act alone; our interaction models the culture and expectations for our district, and we can only take official action when together.
Quite frankly, our district is always changing. We are constantly having to respond to changes in the law, figure out how to pay for new requirements that we don’t receive funding for, and adapt as the needs of our students change. I am glad that our district continues to focus on safety and I would like to see us communicate our plans more clearly with families and our community. I am proud of how many students take advantage of our career/technological education classes and want to continue to make sure we are helping kids find their specific way to succeed. Our staff continues to display their excellence with clean state financial audits, and I want to continue to make decisions that keep us fiscally sound. It is important to me that our employees keep their jobs and we maintain the ability to follow through on everything we have promised to our community.
4.     What relevant experience do you have?
I am completing my first four-year term on the board and have received extensive training through the Washington State School Board Association.
I also grew up in this community. My first job was at Twin City Foods and I began to volunteer in our schools before we even had children. I went on to coordinate MOPS groups, was the PTA President at Twin City Elementary, and am active in the PTO at Port Susan Middle School. Before joining the Board, I was a Classified Substitute Employee for the District. I currently teach Preschool at Our Saviour’s Lutheran and am the Scholarship Coordinator/Executive Assistant for the Stanwood-Camano Area Foundation. I am also a piano accompanist, often playing for our school choirs, and have the privilege of accompanying the Stanwood High Spring Musical. I am the Registrar for Stanwood Lacrosse, a Boy Scout Merit Badge Counselor, and volunteer at my church. I am connected to many people in our community and understand our students, parents, staff and neighbors. 

5.What will be your operating philosophy in office?
I am intentional about my work as a board member – I listen and respond to inquiries, read every document that I vote on, am supportive of staff, and participate in our schools. I am currently the only member with children attending school full time in our district. I am in schools often and experience first-hand the same things our families are experiencing. I’m not afraid to ask questions and also like to let people know when things are going well.
  1. 6. What message would you like to convey to voters?
We have four positions on the ballot this year - two of them do not have incumbents running. It’s imperative that the other two races keep experienced people on our board. It is also important to vote for people who understand the role of the school board and are not looking to get the position to fulfill their own personal agenda.
I have experience on the board and in our community, I have integrity in my actions and choices, and I am relevant for the here and now. I am a parent of students now, I am active in schools now, I am interacting with families now.
Elected Experience: SCSD School Board Director (elected 2015) – current VP
 Other Professional Experience: Previous: Twin City Foods Personnel Manager, Bank of America, Cedarhome Baptist Treasurer, SCSD Classifi ed Substitute, Coastal Community Bank. Current: Our Saviour’s Lutheran Preschool Teacher, Stanwood-Camano Area Foundation Scholarship Coordinator/Executive Assistant, Piano Accompanist.
 Education: Stanwood HS Alumni; Everett Community College; Northwestern College, Orange City IA; WSSDA Advanced Leadership Certifications
 Community Service: Warm Beach MOPS Coordinator, Cedarhome Baptist MOPS Founder, Church Musician, VBS Volunteer, TCE & PSMS Classroom Volunteer, TCE PTA President (volunteer of the year), Stanwood Lacrosse Registrar, Boy Scout Merit Badge Counselor, New SHS Planning Committee, Citizens for Stanwood Camano Schools
 Statement: I am running for Re-Election because I have the experience, integrity and relevance to continue the positive work happening in our schools. I have deep roots in our community as I have lived here for over three decades and worked at numerous local businesses.
I approach my role on the board with integrity; I am always available, quickly respond to community concerns, am willing to listen, and am not afraid to ask questions. I am proud our board is focused on success for every student and fiscal responsibility. I began volunteering at Twin City Elementary before I even had kids. I now have a middle schooler and high schooler and am currently the only board member with children attending school full time in the district, so I understand the perspective of fellow parents. I have the privilege of creating relationships with parents and students at all stages as I teach
preschoolers, volunteer at Port Susan MS, accompany Stanwood HS musicals, and manage our local scholarship program.
Four of the five Director positions are up for election this year. The two incumbents on Camano are not running for re-election; it is imperative that experienced candidates in Stanwood remain on the board.


George P Zeigen gzeigen@yahoo.com www.votezeigen.com
1. Why are you running for this particular position?
I am running for school board because I love our students. I've considered being on the school board for a number of years. Now that I'm retired, I am able to do so. 

Having worked in the school district for 30 years, I feel strongly that our students need a voice in their education and future. Being on the school board will allow me to ask tough questions and get answers. 

I want to ensure we are providing the strongest education along with college and career readiness upon graduation. 

I want to ensure all employees are valued and compensated fairly. 

I want to work with an independent board that is willing to make academic improvements in our district—improvements that will directly benefit students and reach all student populations. 

I want to see the school board go beyond the status quo and look for innovative changes that empower more students to achieve success.

I am running for Position 5 because it is the At-Large position. I’ve worked with students and families throughout the Stanwood-Camano School District for many years, and I feel I am best suited to be the At-Large Director.

2. What do you hope to accomplish in this position? (If an incumbent, what have you accomplished? N/A)
I want to work together with all parties while serving as a voice that puts students first. I want to bridge gaps between the district, staff, and families to ensure students are our first priority.

3. What problems do you see that you expect to correct or alleviate?
Residual strife following last year's teacher strike continues to linger in our community .I want to help mend bridges and ask tough questions to ensure contract negotiations in 2021 are done in the spirit of good faith, mutual cooperation, and respect.

I want to push for programs that prepare students for college and careers. US News & World Report rankings (https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/washington/districts/stanwood-camano-school-district/stanwood-high-school-21209) indicate fewer than 13% of Stanwood High School graduates are ready for university. Stanwood-Camano School District has added Career and Technical Education (CTE) programs, yet we need to do more to increase the hireability of graduates who are not pursuing a college degree. Changes in Washington state graduation requirements force our children to choose between graduating or getting real-world experience. As a district, we need to respond in a manner that allows our students to do both.

Our five elementary schools are experiencing student population growth at different levels, causing overcrowding in some schools. We need to work with families, schools, and the district to find the best possible solutions for students.

4. What relevant experience do you have?
School board directors should possess a higher education and relevant career experience if that is what we expect from our students. I have a Master’s Degree in Social Work from the University of Washington and over 30 years of experience in education.

I started as a school counselor in Stanwood-Camano School District in 1987 and retired in 2018. During those years, I worked with thousands of students and hundreds of families, dozens of teachers, numerous administrators, and two superintendents. 

My position as counselor at Stanwood Middle School put me in the unique position to directly help students work through challenges, mediate for teachers, and represent the district when tragedies struck families from our community as well as the neighboring communities of Marysville and Oso. These experiences equipped me to overcome challenges and look for unique solutions that provide positive outcomes. 

I have raised children and have eight grandchildren. I care about their future and the future of all our students. My dedication to our students motivates me to hear their voices and to be their voice on the school board.

5. What will be your operating philosophy in office?
Put students first. Do the right thing. Be transparent. 

6. What message would you like to convey to voters?
I am the best candidate for this position because I possess a stronger vision and a relevant educational background, and I am a dedicated advocate for students.


From SnoCo sample ballot: Elected Experience: First-time candidate

Other Professional Experience: I can bring a fresh perspective to the school board. In my 30 years as a counselor at Stanwood Middle School, I supported hundreds of families and thousands of students. I understand the challenges families face.

Education: Master of Social Work, University of Washington. Bachelor of Science, Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Washington (with two years at WSU!).

Community Service: I’m a proud husband, father, and grandfather of eight. I volunteer at Twin City Elementary and The Caring Place, manage the Davis Carlson Message Board for the Community Resource Center of Stanwood-Camano, and volunteer with the Stanwood Middle School PTO.
Statement: I love my community: the schools, students, teachers, staff, and families. I am committed to making students the top priority. This entails supporting teachers, staff, and families with resources for student academic and developmental success.

I support classroom collaboration time for teachers; standards-based curriculum that allows for discovery and hands-on learning to meet the needs of all students; and offering multiple education paths and career training. Schools with vision create a positive environment and foster equity for all students.

For many years, I’ve considered joining the school board. Now that I’m retired, it is time. As a school board director, I will use my experience to support funding and services for kids—my first priority. I will ask tough questions and demand thorough answers to bring positive change to our students and schools.
~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . ~

As I have mentioned in other situations (so why is it always with school boards?), I hate having to choose between two good candidates.  I recognize the concern with having an inexperienced school board, but it seems to me that someone who has worked for the district for the last 30 years would at least have some familiarity with the process. With nothing more than the statements above to go on, if I voted in the Stanwood Camano School District, I believe I would vote for George Zeigen


Thursday, January 24, 2019

South Whidbey School District levy election. February 12, 2019


There is, once again, an election – at least for those of us who live in the South Whidbey School District. If you’re outside the district, pardon the intrusion. I don’t know how to separate out subsets of my email distribution list.

In order for your vote to count:
1. Get your ballot in the mail by Monday, February 11 so it will be stamped by Tuesday, February 12. Remember that you don't need to put a stamp on it.Or:
2. Drop it in one of the ballot drop boxes before 8:00 pm on Tuesday, February 12. They are located at:
   
    Island County Elections Office
    400 N Main Street    Coupeville

    Trinity Lutheran Church
    18341 Hwy 525    Freeland

    Ken’s Corner Shopping Center
    4141 Hwy 525 (at Langley Road)    Clinton

    Langley Post Office, front patio
    115  2nd Street        Langley

Marianne’s regular disclaimer: I would never presume to tell you how to vote. That is very much your business. I’m merely telling you how I intend to vote and why. You can make your own decisions from there.

If you haven’t figured it out yet, I take voting very very VERY seriously. If you don’t vote you can’t complain. And that goes even for this single issue school levy.

Here are the 2 issues on the ballot:

South Whidbey School District Replacement Levy for Educational Programs/Operations
            The Board of Directors of South Whidbey School District passed Resolution No. 638 concerning a replacement levy for education. This proposition would authorize the District to levy the following excess taxes, to replace an expiring levy to support the District’s educational programs and operations which are not funded or not fully funded by the State:

Levy year         collection year  levy amount     estimated levy rate per $1000 of
                                                                                    assessed value
2019                2020                $4,017,000                  $0.95
2020                2021                $4,018,000                  $0.95
2021                2022                $4,019,000                  $0.95

As provided in Resolution No. 638. Should this proposition be approved?
Yes
No

I will be voting YES

This is a regular maintenance and operations levy. It has to be renewed every few years and this is one of those renewal years. This maintains existing programs in food services, special ed, athletics, music, art, and bus services. All pretty basic stuff which really should be part of the basic funding. It is not, which means that we have to pick up the slack.


South Whidbey School District Technology, Capital Improvements and Safety
            The Board of Directors of South Whidbey School District No. 206 adopted Resolution No. 639 for capital improvement levies. This levy funds the renovation, upgrading and modernization of District educational facilities, including safety, security and technology improvements and authorizes the following excess levies on all taxable property within the District:

Levy year         collection year  levy amount                 estimated levy rater per $1000 of
                                                                                                Assessed value

2019                2020                $2,250,000                              $0.52
2020                2021                $2,250,000                              $0.51
2021                2022                $2,250,000                              $0.50
2022                2023                $2,250,000                              $0.49
2023                2024                $2,250,000                              $0.48
2024                2025                $2,250,000                              $0.47

As provided in Resolution No. 639. Should this proposition be approved?
Yes
No

I will be voting YES

This is the capital improvements levy. It covers renovations, upgrades, modernization, safety, security, and tech upgrades. Again, these things should all be part of the basic funding, but is not. So we pick up the slack with local levies.

For more information:
https://www.facebook.com/southwhidbeyschooldistrict/

I could not find anyone speaking or writing against these levies - which tells you something.

 To misquote the old saying: “if you don’t like paying for education, consider the cost of ignorance.” I am not privy to the internal workings of the South Whidbey School District. Maybe there is room for tightening the budget or re-aligning priorities. And maybe there is not. What I hear from teachers is that they could do so much more if only they had the resources. I wish we could give them those resources. The least we can do is not deprive them of the resources they have to date. 

I checked with the county elections office and these levies require a simple 50%+1 majority to pass, and there is no minimum number of ballots. Still, it would be good to let the school district know that we support them. You've got your ballots by now (if you don't, check with the county elections office to find out why not), so fill them in and get them returned while you're thinking about them.


Sunday, October 21, 2018

County Commissioner race update

Well, I was totally put off by the offensive piece I found in my mailbox yesterday and wondering what to do about it. I should have known, Janet St Clair was on top of it. Here's her response to a somewhat childish hit piece by Rick Hannold.  On one side of the mailer he tells us all the wonderful things he claims to have done. As I've mentioned before, he is very good at taking credit for the work of others. On the other side he makes all sorts of claims about Janet, including using $ signs for the S in her name.

Here's an interesting one: while Hannold claims to have "saved" Conservation Futures, in this piece he accuses Janet of wanting *Increased "Conservation Futures" property taxes on Island County homeowners.  So which is it? Did he save Conservation Futures or destroy it? We know he advocated against the program - and then claimed credit for the good it did at Barnum Point. As I've said before, giving credit where credit is due doesn't cost anything and there's plenty to go around. I guess not for Rick Hannold.

He claims Janet wants to raise gas prices 'for $eattle special interest groups.' That translates to Janet supports I-1631, the fossil fuel fee which is necessary to move Washington to a renewable economy. But then Rick Hannold doesn't believe climate change is real, so why change what we're doing?

Anyway, let Janet say it in her own words:

Subject: Staying positive, staying focused...it's about the issues
Date: October 21, 2018 9:42:20 AM PDT
To: Marianne Edain <fh@whidbey.com>

Well, my opponent released his first mass mailer this weekend.  While doorbelling, a voter commented that he received it and considered it “campaign silliness.”  I guess Mr. Hannold can make up silly names about me but we will continue a campaign based on the issues and our values of inclusive, respectful and responsive leadership.

As a senior executive in nonprofit organizations, I spent nearly 20 years developing effective programs to better serve people, with efficient resources and strong outcomes.  My responsibilities spanned six counties in North Puget Sound where I worked to develop and advocate for access to care across urban and rural areas.  I built strong and effective teams that worked collaboratively to provide innovative solutions.  I know how to work with local stakeholders as well as state and federal partners to bring resources to our communities.

I’m quite certain my opponent doesn’t want the voters to look too closely at the true results of his four years in office.  But let’s take a look by starting with his own claims:

    1.    He claims he “led the ban on fish net pens.” That legislation was passed in 2012…THREE years before he took office.  He denies climate science and resists policies to protect our environment. I will continue to promote education, incentives and when necessary legislation for a sustainable Puget Sound.

    2.    He claims he “shepherded Barnum Point across the finish line” yet initially opposed that land acquisition and gives no recognition to Whidbey Camano Land Trust or FOCIP for their heroic efforts to protect this legacy for future generations. I will work with community partners to support their efforts and give credit where credit is due.

    3.    He says his first response is “What about Camano” and he brought “extra” services to this Island, extra services that are core programs on Whidbey. Camano Island has waited years for housing, mental health and veteran support.  It finally arrived in his last year in office and only on a limited basis.  He claims we "are resistent to change" when criticized for not engaging the community on our new county annex.  We are not resistent to change, Mr. Hannold, we just want a voice in the issues that affect us.

in his recent mailer, he dug down deep and the worst he came up with about me…I’m from Seattle and a Democrat.  Then in an astounding lack of knowledge about the difference between the roles of a County Commissioner and a State Legislator created a confusing list of policies I’ve neither suggested nor, in many cases, could implement as your next Island County Commissioner.  Let’s elect someone who understands the job, demonstrates integrity and has a truly proven record of accomplishments.

So what can you do to make sure we don’t allow Rick Hannold to waste four more years with negative and extreme partisan politics, self-centered leadership and inability to develop effective and broad-based solutions for our communities…Help me set the record straight.  Share this email with friends or neighbors, join our social media outreach and share our message or volunteer to phone bank or doorbell to get out the vote.  It’s time for voters to make a new choice.
Janet St. Clair has proven leadership, experience and integrity.
  
Fire Rick, hire Janet as your next Island County Commissioner.

Thank you for your support,
Janet




Janet St Clair  http://www.janetstclair.com/

Thursday, October 18, 2018

2018 General Election

 Its the 2018 General Election

     I can hear the thud of ballots dropping as I type furiously to get the blog done. I know I promised to have it available before you got your ballots. Then I was informed that the October 19 date was not the deadline for mailing but the deadline for receiving. I started getting calls yesterday. I presume that many of you have received your ballots today. Good thing we’re live and ready.

First, you need to know that you are registered to vote. To check, go to
https://weiapplets.sos.wa.gov/MyVote/#/login  
The deadline for registering on line or for changing name or address has passed. If you miss that deadline you will have to go to the

Elections Office at
400 N Main Street in Coupeville.
The deadline to register or change your name or address in person is October 29, 2018.

For more information call 360-679-7366 or email  elections@co.island.wa.us
They’re open 8:00 – 4:30  Monday - Friday

The Elections Office tells us that ballots must be postmarked
on or before election day, November 6.
The League of Women Voters has just let us all know that the Postal Service is being less than helpful. Ballots dropped in mailboxes in Island County get shipped to Seattle for processing, and are usually postmarked the next day. Which means your ballot would be postmarked too late. So if you drop your ballot in the mail on November 6 it may very well not be counted. NOT GOOD!

There are several solutions.
1. Get your ballot in the mail by Monday, November 5.
2. If you can’t do it before November 6, take it to the counter and ask the postal clerk to hand stamp it. And no, you don’t need to put a stamp on it.
3. Drop it in one of the 6 ballot drop boxes before 8:00 pm on Tuesday, November 6. They are located at:
   
    Island County Elections Office
    400 N Main Street    Coupeville

    Trinity Lutheran Church
    18341 Hwy 525    Freeland

    Ken’s Corner Shopping Center
    4141 Hwy 525 (at Langley Road)    Clinton

    Island County Camano Annex
    121 N East Camano Drive    Camano Island

    Langley Post Office, front patio
    115  2nd Street        Langley

    Oak Harbor City Hall
    865 SE Barrington    Oak Harbor

If you haven’t received a ballot by October 22, contact the Elections office.

And here is Marianne’s regular disclaimer: I would never presume to tell you how to vote. That is very much your business. I’m merely telling you how I intend to vote and why. You can make your own decisions from there.

I’m beginning to learn about this blogging business, so that now I no longer have vagrant italics or underlines, and this time I’ve even figure out how to make sure all the web links are live and functional. Next thing you know I’ll learn how to add images (don’t hold your breath).

Whatever you do, VOTE. And encourage, hassle, bug, and convince everyone you know to vote as well. Feel free to forward information about the blog to all and sundry. Your vote has never been more important. The planet and government you save may be your own.

Initiative 1631

 Initiative Measure No. 1631 concerns pollution.

 This measure would charge pollution fees on sources of greenhouse gas pollutants and use the revenue to reduce pollution, promote clean energy, and address climate change impacts, under oversight of a public board.

 Should this measure be enacted into law?
 yes
 no

 I’ve been studying 1631 since before it qualified for the ballot. It is long and complicated. This is a whole program which will change how a number of state agencies operate. The initiative itself runs to 38 pages. The Voter’s Guide which has now shown up in your mailboxes has a surprisingly good (and long) summary, particularly the ‘fiscal impact’ section. I recommend reading it.

 The basics: energy used in Washington State will pay a fee at the wholesale end, starting at $15.00/ton of CO2 emissions, into a special state fund. This means that pipelines bringing oil, trains hauling coal, and similar sources, will pay the fee. There is a complicated schedule of just who pays and when, in order to avoid either double payment or non-payment. There are, as the NO people tout constantly, certain exemptions. One of those exemptions is for fuels moving through Washington but not for use here. There is an exemption for PSE’s Centralia coal fired electric generation plant, with the rationale that it is scheduled to be shut down in 2025 anyway. There are also exemptions for certain power intensive industries which claim they could not continue to operate otherwise. I have some heartburn with that, but it is relatively small in the overall scheme of things.

 Yes, it is likely that some prices will increase, especially gasoline and propane, but probably also PSE, which generates some 60% of its electricity from fossil fuels. There is no mandate for retail price increases, and the fee is actually a very small amount compared to profits, but we can expect the industries to use the fee as an excuse to raise prices.

 Ok, that’s the down side. The up side is that the funds collected will go into a specifically designated fund – and here’s where things get a bit complicated. There are specific targets for how the funds are to be disbursed. Hold your hats. Here we go.
 70% of total expenditures must be used for clean air and clean energy investments.
  25% must be used for clean water and healthy forests investments.
 5% must be used for healthy communities investments.

 Don’t even try to add up the percentages because there is a whole lot of overlap.
The state agencies are directed to map out particularly contaminated and polluted areas of the state. Those will be designated as “pollution and health action areas.” and will have priority for cleanup funds.
A minimum of 35% must provide direct meaningful benefits to “pollution & health action areas.”

A minimum of 10% of funds must benefit one or more tribes. There is a provision that the tribes must be consulted on any project affecting either their lands or their usual and accustomed fishing sites.

There is a specific definition of what constitutes a benefit.

 This kind of says it all:
 §4. (1)  All funds must be used for programs, activities, or projects that yield or facilitate verifiable reductions in pollution or assist affected workers or people with lower incomes during the transition to a clean energy economy.

 Various state agencies, including Dept of Commerce, WSU Extension Energy Program, WSDOT, Utilities Commission, Ecology, DNR, Dept of Ag, and RCO (the Recreation & Conservation Office, which disburses funds for acquisition of lands for conservation) are all given pieces of the fund to administer, and are all directed to create procedures and criteria. The bottom line is that they all need to show to the new board how they plan to meet the CO2 reduction standards.

The plan must prescribe a competitive project selection process that results in a balanced portfolio of investments containing a wide range of tech, sequestration, and emission reduction solutions to reduce CO2 from 2018 levels by a minimum of 20 million metric tons by 2035 and 50 million metric tons by 2050 – while creating economic, environmental, and health benefits.

 There are very specific requirements for how to help poor people and those whose jobs will disappear.
Either Commerce or a utility, in consultation with poor people, will develop plans to carry out this section to maximize the number of poor people who will benefit. The plan must be submitted to the Board for approval. It anticipates:
    ~ bill assistance programs
    ~ reduce dependence on fossil fuel transportation via public and shared transportation
    ~ reduce household energy consumption via weatherization and/or solar panel installation
    ~ community renewables, owned by participants
In consultation with non-profits and tribes, design and implement comprehensive enrollment campaigns. The intent is to enroll 100% of poor people.

(5) within 4 years a minimum of $50mil/year must be set aside to maintain a worker support program for fossil fuel workers affected by the transition. Commerce may allocate additional funds as necessary.
    (a) worker support: full wage replacement, health benefits, pension contributions for every worker within 5 years of retirement. (there is a whole calculus of how long people have to have worked, etc). Up to 2 years of retraining costs, including tuition & related costs based on in-state community and tech college costs. Peer counseling services during transition, employment placement services, prioritizing employment in the clean energy sector, relocation expenses, and many other services deemed necessary.

§5. Clean Water & Healthy Forests
    Funding must be used to: restore and protect estuaries, fisheries, and marine shoreline habitats; prepare for sea level rise; address ocean acidification; reduce flood risk; restore natural floodplain ecological function; increase the sustainable supply of water; improve aquatic habitat, including groundwater mapping and modeling; improve infrastructure treating stormwater from inside UGAs.
    Healthy forests funds must be used to: increase resilience to wildfire; improve forest health; reduce vulnerability to changes in hydrology, insect infestation, and other impacts of climate change.
    DNR must set standards and create rules. These funds may not be used to violate tribal treaty rights or result in ‘significant long term damage’ to critical habitat or ecological functions. Investments must result in long term environmental benefit and increased resiliency to the impact of climate change.

§6 Healthy Communities investments. Creates a Healthy Communities account.
Funds will: enhance community preparedness and awareness before, during, and after wildfire; relocate tribal communities impacting by flooding as sea level rises; teacher professional training re environmental, social, & economic impacts of climate change; and strategies to reduce pollution.

DNR must develop procedures, criteria, and rules, which must prioritize benefits to communities with limited English proficiency and other vulnerable populations in communities at risk from wildfire.
    20% of the fund must be set aside to develop community capacity to participate in implementation, including teaching people grant writing. Funding is a competitive process, with a preference for vulnerable populations in Pollution and Health Action areas (defined elsewhere) and rural communities. Any tribe that applies must receive up to $200k/year to build tribal capacity to participate.

(9) "Environmental burdens" refers to the cumulative risks to communities caused by historic and current:
     (a) Exposure to conventional and toxic hazards in the air, water, and land, and;
     (b) Adverse environmental effects, which are environmental conditions caused or made worse by contamination or pollution or that create vulnerabilities to climate impacts.


    There will be created an Environmental and Economic Justice panel which will review funding proposals for consistency with the standards set. This is the “unelected board” the NO people are so upset about. That “unelected board” actually consists of 15 voting members, who must review and approve projects. It will consist of the Commissioner of Public Lands (DNR), directors of Dept of Commerce, Ecology, and Recreation and Conservation Office, 4 at-large positions and 6 co-chairs of the 3 investment panels. There are specific requirements for these positions. The governor appoints the chair and the 4 at-large positions, one of whom must be a tribal representative and one of whom must represent vulnerable populations in a polluted area. The Dept of Health, WSDOT, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction will be non-voting members. The chair is a full time staff position housed in the office of the governor. Board members serve 4 year terms. Those who are not state employees are entitled to compensation.

    The Clean Air and Clean Energy panel must be co-chaired by one business representative and a representative of labor. The panel may have a maximum of 9 members representing tribal, environmental, business, and labor communities.

    The Clean Water and Healthy Forests panel must be co-chaired by one tribal leader and one representative of statewide environmental interests. Again, a maximum of 9 panel members representing tribal, environmental, business, labor, and a “pollution and health action” area.

    The Environmental and Economic Justice panel must be co-chaired by one tribal leader and one representative of vulnerable populations, plus 2 union reps, and 5 other members of whom at least one is a tribal rep and two represent vulnerable populations.

    The duties of each of the panels are spelled out in great detail, including a schedule of deadlines for each of the many tasks.

    And on it goes. This is long, detailed, incredibly thought out, inclusive, and workable for poor people. There are parts of it I don’t like, for instance the part that says that utilities can take a credit against the fee for qualifying projects. I feel somewhat better about it when it says that Investor Owned Utilities (read that as PSE) may not take a profit from any fee exempt project.

    I was crabby about 1631 at first. I thought it was too little too late. After reading the thing I have changed my mind. This is going to be a major change in how Washington operates. It is a desperately needed major change. Most of you will have heard of the latest report by the International Panel on Climate Change, the one which gives us about a decade to clean up our act before the planet simply shrugs us off. 1631 is Washington’s attempt to take that warning seriously and do what needs doing – and trying to take care of those who could be hurt most in doing so.

    Here’s the financial picture:

Clean Air Clean Energy Washington (the coalition sponsoring 1631)        $11,215,526.13
Major donors include:
    The Nature Conservancy
    League of Conservation Voters
    Bill Gates
    Action Now Initiative
    Nick Hanauer
    Washington Environmental Council
    Washington State Labor Council
    Washington Conservation Voters
    NW Energy Efficiency Council
    Green Advocacy Project
    Front and Centered/Latino Community Fund
    Climate Solutions
    Audubon Washington

No on 1631  (sponsored by Western States Petroleum)                $22,127,179.90
And just in case you were under any illusions, the major donors to the No campaign are:
   Phillips 66
   BP America
   Andeavor (used to be Tesoro)
  American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers
  US Oil & Refining Co
  Koch Industries
  Chevron USA
  Valero Energy Corp
  PBF Energy
  Western States Petroleum Assoc
   

     I have been campaigning for 1631, writing about it, testifying for it, even going way out of my comfort zone and canvassing door to door for it. And now I’m blogging for it. If we want to continue living on a planet which continues to support us, we need 1631.

    I will be voting an enthusiastic and hopeful YES.



Initiative 1634

Initiative Measure No. 1634 concerns taxation of certain items intended for human consumption.

This measure would prohibit new or increased local taxes, fees, or assessments on raw or processed foods or beverages (with exceptions), or ingredients thereof, unless effective by January 15, 2018, or generally applicable.

Should this measure be enacted into law?
yes
no

https://www.seattlepi.com/local/politics/article/Connelly-Coke-and-Pepsi-put-5-1-million-into-13147294.php?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=dailynewsletterspi&utm_term=spi

As of 10-18-18 the PDC reports that “Yes to Affordable Groceries” has raised over $20 million. By painful contrast, the Healthy Kids Coalition has raised a whopping $16k.

Other jurisdictions have taxed or banned outright the sale of high fructose sugary drinks and can actually track improvements in public health as a result. The industry obviously is not thrilled with having their somewhat toxic products banned or taxed and is throwing millions into some very imaginative advertising campaigns. I just Googled I-1634 and the first hits are: Washington Initiative 1634, Prohibit Local Taxes on Groceries, and Yes! To Affordable Groceries,  and November 6, 2018 general election TNT endorsement against Initiative 1634.

Ballotopedia (www.ballotopedia.org/Washington) reported in September that the Yes campaign had received over $8 mil in donations from such companies as Coca Cola, Pepsi, Dr Pepper/Snapple, Red Bull, and the Washington Grocery Association. The opposition, the Healthy Kids Coalition, reported $250.00. As ever and always, the big guys, in this case the soft drink industry, can buy or bully to get what they want, which is no responsibility for the damage they are doing the public health.

Here’s the breakdown as of 10-18-18:

Coca-Cola Co        $9,653,767.73
Pepsico                   $7,278,737.28
Keurig Dr Pepper   $2,109,261.30
Red Bull                 $237,212.31

I am disgusted, and even though I expect this will pass based on that huge advertising budget,

I will be voting a resounding NO.

Initiative 1639

Initiative Measure No 1639 concerns firearms.

This measure would require increased background checks, training, age limitations, and waiting periods for sales or delivery of semiautomatic assault rifles; criminalize noncompliant storage upon unauthorized use; allow fees; and enact other provisions.

Should the measure be enacted into law?
Yes
No

The League of Women Voters (bless them) has done a great job of summarizing the issues. Check their review here: https://lwvwa.org/ballot-measures

They tried valiantly to maintain a neutral stance, but that is really hard when the “no” side comes up with the inane arguments they do. For starters, we’re dealing only with assault rifles. I, for one, believe that assault rifles, if they are to exist at all, belong strictly in the military, in spite of Dave Hayes’ quip at the candidates’ night that “one man’s assault rifle is another’s hunting rifle.” If we can’t ban these weapons outright, then the least we can do is impose some pretty obvious and basic measures. It turns out that the limitations being proposed already exist for hand guns. Who knew that assault rifles were less regulated than pistols? The “no” people claim that a background check is an imposition on their 2nd  amendment rights. They claim that even if we limit the legitimate market there will still be a black market. They don’t seem to understand that the black market is illegal. That’s why its called the black market. They object to the 21year minimum age to own one of these weapons with the argument that young people are able to enlist in the military at age 18 and they’ll use such weapons there. What seems to be lost on these people is the fact that the military is highly regimented, and while young soldiers are indeed taught to use these weapons, they are also taught the rules and responsibilities around that use, and they don’t get to take them into town on leave. I’m just waiting for the gun lovers to claim they have a 2nd amendment right to own a shoulder mounted missile launcher, and a Scud missile, and . . .

The part about "criminalize non-compliant storage upon unauthorized use" translates as: if you leave it lying around, rather than storing it under lock and key, and someone does something bad (like killing the neighbors) with it, then you will be held criminally liable for making the weapon easy to get at. 


https://www.mcclatchydc.com/latest-news/article218426785.html
Prospective owners would have to prove that they have completed a firearm safety training program in the last 5 years.
Existing rules that dealers must wait to deliver pistols to buyers with outstanding arrest warrants would be expanded to include semiautomatic rifles. One wonders just why people with outstanding arrest warrants are able to buy any kind of gun.

I think it is telling that the conditions being imposed already exist for hand guns. One has to wonder why a permit and training are required for a pistol but not for an AR 15.

Following the money:

Pro 1639:
Safe Schools, Safe Communities        $4,662,378.02
Major donors include:
    Paul Allen
    Nick Hanauer
    Steve Ballmer
    Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund
    Alliance for Gun Responsibility Foundation
    FUSE Voters
    Nancy Nordhoff
    Washington State Association for Justice

Anti 1639:
Save Our Security, No on 1639        $51,613.28
Shall Not Be Infringed            $29,801.61
Stop 1639, Shall Not Be Infringed        $31,075.96
Washingtonians & NRA for Freedom    $455,780.83

I happen to hate guns and the harm they do to innocent and unsuspecting citizens just trying to live their lives.

I will be voting an enthusiastic YES.