The 'Limited' Survey

This is the survey which was handed out at the first of 4 community meetings. Attendees were told that it would not be made available outside those meetings. That seemed a bit unfair, so I have duplicated it here for your use. Please copy it as you can and post your responses to Amanda Almgren, long range planner, at a.almgren@co.island.wa.us

Feel free to expand on your thoughts and reasoning.

 

Island County 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update Public Meeting Questionnaire

1. Values - Please  rate  how  strongly  you support   the following  statements:

(One indicating that you strongly support the statement and five indicating that you do not support the statement)

Statement                                                                            strongly support                      do not support
                                                                                                1              2            3           4               5
The existing character of Island County's rural areas
should be protected, even if this means greater restrictions
on new development and the use of land for purposes
other than agriculture or residences.

Improving public access to beaches and shorelines should
be a priority, even if this means higher taxes for parks in
the County or redirecting funds from other purposes.

The ability of property owners to use or develop their property
however they want should be prioritized above protecting
Island County's rural character and landscapes.

The County should prioritize environmental protection, even
if it means increasing the size of protective buffers where
development is restricted.

New development should be concentrated in areas which are
already developed, even if this means limiting the amount of
development which can occur in rural areas.

Economic development should be encouraged, but new
commercial uses should primarily be located within built-up
areas, cities, and towns.

Tourism should be encouraged in Island County, even if it
places a strain on infrastructure and resources.

The preservation of historic structures and landscapes should be
expanded outside of Ebey's Reserve, even if it means
regulating the use of land or modification to historic structures.

The remaining large tracts of land should be protected even if it
means increasing the minimum size of new parcels.

The Conservation Futures Fund (a tx levied when property is
bought or sold to pay for open space conservation) should be
increased so that more land can be purchased or protected.

2. Priorities - The County has a set amount of time for the Comprehensive Plan update effort. If you were given total control, how would you allocate time (by percentage) to each of the following categories. Please explain any specific areas you would focus on. You may create your own categories, but you may not exceed 100%. (Note that transportation is not included as an option because it is already in progress).

Topic                                                       Time     Explanation

Protecting and enhancing Open
Space & Rural Scenery

Land Use (determining what should
be allowed where)

Environmental Protection

Affordable housing

Access to Parks, Beaches and
Outdoor Recreational Facilities

Tourism

Historic Preservation

Agriculture & Local Food

Simplifying and clarifying Island
County's codes and regultions

Other:

Other:

Total                                                      100%

Election follow-up, the recount

Yeah, I know. You all thought the election was, thankfully, over, done, and behind us. And mostly it is. We had a very few wins and a whole lot of painful losses.

One race, however, remains to be decided in a recount. That is the race for Island County Commissioner, district 3, with Karla Jacks 143 votes behind Rick Hannold. That’s out of a total of 29,583 votes cast. Do the math and the difference comes to 0.48% of the vote. By state law, if the difference is less than 0.5%, there must be a recount. What we don’t know is how many votes were set aside as “undervotes.” That is what this recount is all about.

Thanks to Jane Seymour for doing the homework on this one. Here’s what she discovered:

The recount will be overseen by three sitting public officials:

County Prosecutor Greg Banks

County Commissioner Helen Price-Johnson

County Auditor Sheilah Crider.

This is a public process and I strongly encourage members of the public to attend and keep a sharp eye out.

There will not be a recount of every single ballot. The existing counts, done separately for each precinct, will be “validated”, and I’m not at all sure what that means. There will be a close and thorough examination of the log of “undervotes” which was created during the counting process.  By law every person whose ballot is questioned (an 'undervote') must be contacted by the Auditor’s office, so they may correct whatever error is claimed. Those errors can include:

            ~ no vote for the office

            ~ the mark is not in the box but near it

            ~ its not clear that the mark is intentional

            and I’m sure there are others.

There are also those voters who failed to sign the outside of the envelope, or who signed with a name different from what’s in the Auditor’s files, or whose signature doesn’t look the same as the original in the Auditor’s files.

If you or anyone you know received a phone call or a postcard from the Auditor’s office, please PLEASE contact them ASAP to correct whatever error, and make your ballot count.

The recount is scheduled for December 1. It will very likely take all day, or even longer. Please consider spending a thrilling hour or two or three participating in this civic exercise.

If you really want to dig into this, the relevant laws are:

RCW 29A.64 dealing with recounts

WAC 434.264 dealing with rules for recounts

You can check out the Secretary of State’s website for more information:

www.sos.wa.gov/elections/administrators.aspx

or you can phone the Secretary of State’s office, Elections Division, at 360-902-4180

November 4, 2014 General Election

Coming right up is a very important election. I hope everybody votes. They make it so easy these days, mailing the ballot right to your mailbox.

The last day to register was October 6.

BUT

If you are a new voter in Washington, you may register IN PERSON at the Auditor’s office, 400 N Main Street, Coupeville, up to October 27.

Ballots will be mailed no later than October 17.

Ballots must be returned no later than November 4.

            You can mail your ballot, as long as the postmark is on or before November 4.

            Or you can drop your ballot into one of 5 special collection boxes at:

                        Island County Elections Office           400 N Main Street         Coupeville

                        Oak Harbor City Hall                           865 SE Barrington        Oak Harbor

                        Trinity Lutheran Church                      18341 Hwy 525             Freeland

                        Ken’s Corner Red Apple                      4141 Hwy 525               Clinton

                        Camano Annex                                    121 N East Camano Dr  Camano

For questions, contact  elections@co.island.wa.us

or phone 360-679-7366  M-F  9:00 – 4:00

I have arranged the measures and offices as they were listed in the sample ballot provided by Island County Elections. 

General Election   November 2014

Measures, state

I-1351 concerns k-12 education          This measure would direct the legislature to allocate funds to reduce class sizes and increase staffing support for students in all K-12 grades, with additional class-size reductions and staffing increases in high-poverty schools.

Should this measure be enacted into law?
[  ]  Yes
[  ]  No

The details are messy, but the bottom line is that this would increase funding for state schools, specifically to reduce class size. The Fiscal Impact Statement claims that I-1351 will not increase or decrease state revenues, but it will increase state expenditures. It will allow districts to run bigger levies. While I am not clear on the funding formula, I know that schools all over the state are underfunded.  Reducing classroom size can only help. And coincidentally, the state supreme court has directed pretty much the same thing – reducing class size. 

I’ll be voting Yes

I-591 concerns firearms           This measure would prohibit government agencies from confiscating guns or other firearms from citizens without due process, or from requiring background checks on firearm recipients unless a uniform national standard is required.
Should this measure be enacted into law?
[  ]  Yes
[  ]  No

You’ve got to be kidding. I can just imagine the masked bandit robbing the Wells Fargo in Clinton, and the cop (assuming there was one handy) not being allowed to confiscate his gun. And that “uniform national standard” limits background checks to licensed gun dealers. That leaves a lot of room for private deals. In fact, check I-594, below.

There’s another problem with this initiative. When Tim Eyman was having so much fun with multiple initiatives, the state supreme court ruled that an initiative could address only a single subject. This one patently addresses two different issues relating to guns. It is very likely that if this passes, it will go to court and be invalidated.

And then there’s yet another problem. If both I-591 and I-594 pass, which is quite possible, they effectively cancel each other, and its back to court to settle the inconsistency. Great way to spend our tax dollars.

I happen to have a strong dislike of guns and the mentality of people who feel a need to carry them. I believe we have a right to make sure people who buy guns are reasonably sane. 

I will be voting NO!

I-594 concerns background checks for firearm sales & transfers.          This measure would apply currently used criminal and public safety background checks by licensed dealers to all firearm sales and transfers, including gun show and online sales, with specific exceptions.

Should this measure be enacted into law?
[  ]  Yes
[  ]  No

Here’s the flip side of I-591 above. It would expand the requirement for background checks beyond just licensed firearm dealers. This would include gun shows, on-line sales, and private transactions. Gifts within families would be exempt, as would antique firearms. I think we have a right to some assurance that people carrying guns are reasonably sane and haven’t killed anyone lately. This is totally obvious and necessary.

I will be voting Yes

Advisory votes

These require some explanation, and the best source is the Secretary of State’s office. Here is their statement:  

            “This is the third straight year that Advisory Votes have been on Washington’s General Election ballot. The first two Advisory Votes were placed on the 2012 ballot and Nos. 3 through 7 appeared last year. Because Advisory Votes are nonbinding, the result is not a repeal of the bill, as would be the case with a referendum measure. The Legislature is not required to take action based on the results of Advisory Votes.”

  So this is basically Tim Eyman wasting a lot of the public’s time and tax dollars. Thanks Tim.

AV No 8 (SB 6505) concerns marijuana excise tax.      The legislature eliminated, without a vote of the people, agricultural excise tax preferences for various aspects of the marijuana industry, costing an estimated $24,903,000 in the first ten years, for government spending.

This tax increase should be:
[  ]  Repealed
[  ]  Maintained

These advisory votes need a certain amount of decoding. Thank Tim Eyman for the convoluted language.

First of all, this is NOT a tax increase. In fact, it is exactly the opposite. What’s really going on is that agriculture enjoys a whole bunch of tax breaks, including B&O, sales, and property taxes. There was an assumption that marijuana operations would enjoy those same breaks. The legislature passed senate bill 6505 to postpone those tax breaks until the industry was up and running and the kinks were worked out. The “estimated cost” is a complete fantasy, with numbers picked out of a hat, for how much the industry as a whole would be paying in taxes each year. That “cost” is actually the amount of tax income the state expects to take in over the next 10 years. As I said, the numbers are a fantasy.

I object to being pushed toward someone else’s proposed conclusion, including the suggestion that this measure should be repealed.

I will be voting to Maintain this measure.

AV No 9 (ESHB 1287) concerns leasehold excise tax on tribal property.   The legislature imposed, without a vote of the people, the leasehold excise tax on certain leasehold interests in tribal property, costing an estimated $1,298,000 in the first ten years, for government spending.
This tax increase should be:
[  ]  Repealed
[  ]  Maintained

This one gets very murky very quickly, but I think the Progressive Voters’ Guide says it about as clearly as possible. Here’s what they have to say:

“Thanks to a Tim Eyman initiative, the state legislature is required to submit any bill it passes that closes tax loopholes or raises revenues to a non-binding advisory vote. An overwhelming majority of legislators came together earlier this year to clarify that federally recognized Native American tribes must follow the same tax rules as state and local governments when it comes to privately leasing land that is owned exclusively by the tribe. The uncontroversial House Bill 1287 passed the legislature 93 to 44.”

I will be voting to Maintain this measure.

Federal candidates

            Since we no longer get printed copies of Voter Guides, and few people can find the on-line versions available from Island County (https://wei.sos.wa.gov/county/island/en/Elections/Pages/OnlineVotersGuide.aspx) or the WA Secretary of State (https://wei.sos.wa.gov/agency/osos/en/press_and_research/PreviousElections/2014/General-Election/Pages/Online-Voters-Guide.aspx), I figured I would post the candidates’ statements here for your perusal.  I’ve had comment from one reviewer about typos and mangled sentences in the Candidates’ statements. I agree. There are. I didn’t put them there. I cut and pasted those directly from the Island County Elections website.

2^nd congressional district

Rick Larsen,  D

Candidate’s statement:

Elected Experience: It is my privilege to serve as the Representative for Washington’s 2nd Congressional District. I’ve also served on the Snohomish County Council.
Other Professional Experience: Prior to working as a public official I was employed by the Port of Everett and the Washington State Dental Association.
Education: I graduated from Pacific Lutheran University in Washington state and have a masters degree from the University of Minnesota.
Community Service: My parents were an important influence on me, encouraging me to be involved in my local community. Their encouragement continues to be a motivation for my service to our communities.
Statement: I was born and raised in Arlington. My mom and dad raised me with the values I now teach my own children: community, service and commitment.

These values guide my work and my belief in a country that creates opportunities for the middle class and expands participation in our democracy and economy. That’s why I’m working to raise the national minimum wage, combat income inequality, create jobs in our community, and fix our broken immigration system.

Income inequality has been called the “defining challenge of our time.” We need to rise to this challenge and build a ladder for those seeking to break into the middle class. There’s no better place to start than by raising the minimum wage. Washington state has a minimum wage that is the envy of many others, but there’s more to be done. I’ll work hard in Congress to increase the national minimum wage and tie future increases to inflation.

I’m also working to put people back to work. The best way to create jobs is to invest in our transportation systems. Building and repairing our roads, bridges and highways will grow our economy and immediately put people to work. I’ve been a leader on transportation issues in Congress and will continue my strong support for investments to improve safety and spur economic growth in our communities.

And I’m committed to expanding opportunities for everyone to participate in our economy and democracy. We must reform America’s broken immigration laws by establishing a clear pathway to citizenship, destroy any barrier that prevents people who are registered to vote from exercising that right, extend unemployment benefits to the long-term unemployed and support efforts that ensure marriage equality exists in every state.

None of this will be easy, but I’m up for the challenge.

Contact:

(425) 259-1866

rick@ricklarsen.org

www.ricklarsen.org

B J Guillot,  R

Candidate’s statement

Elected Experience: Chair, Marysville Library Board.

Other Professional Experience: Vice President of Product Management at multinational firm providing Public Safety solutions (EMS, Fire, 9-1-1) to municipalities. Team Lead and Software Developer at multinational energy company. Sole proprietor of computer software startup developing custom built solutions to solve specific industry problems.

Education: B.S. in Computer Science and Mathematics from the University of Houston.

Community Service: Manage website to inform residents about the status of Paine Field commercial flights. Advocate for electric cars.

Statement: Let's face it. Many have been hurt by the lack of jobs, college debt, and too much government red tape. We all see the empty storefronts. We can now do something about it–together. Listening to you will be my hallmark. I care for you, your family, and our country's future.

People are hurting. The middle class is shrinking. Too many jobs from Skagit, Whatcom, Island, San Juan, and Snohomish Counties have been lost or moved out of State. (Boeing, Kimberly Clark, Penguin Windows, Visiting Nurse Home Care, just to name a few.) College graduates frequently find few or no jobs in their industry. They often face having to take two part-time jobs without benefits, just to make ends meet.

I will fight hard to bring jobs and businesses into our communities, starting by working together to reduce the burden of government regulations to make our district more desirable.

I will stand for reducing the debt, ending and keeping our country out of unnecessary wars, and restoring our civil liberties. The Patriot Act and domestic spying on our phone calls, emails, and web usage must stop. Representing you, I will do something about it!

And I will listen to you, as well as let you know how legislation will impact you and your family. One approach will be to use electronic innovations to enhance contact with your Congressman, resulting in a more responsive representative. This keeps us neighbor to neighbor, and you can provide input on the issues you care about from home, work, or public library. You will have the tools to express constructive views on creating jobs and opportunities. You are the best source of new ideas.

I will bring listening, reason, and innovation to our community. I ask and thank you for your powerful vote

Contact:

(425) 322-4610

info@vote4bj.com www.vote4bj.com

Since maintaining a functional planet on which to live is rather important to me, I checked with some people I trust at Only One Climate. www.onlyoneclimate.org  reports:

Rick Larsen:  Voted NO on barring EPA from regulating greenhouse gases. Voted YES on enforcing limits on CO2 global warming pollution. Voted YES on tax incentives for renewable energy. BJ Guillot said: "Global warming is real. I'm not afraid to say it. I consider myself to be a science geek, and the data is just unmistakable. Responsible action is needed to combat the change, but without destroying the economy. A comprehensive plan can solve this by utilizing cleaner energy sources like solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear." "Scientific evidence leaves no doubt that our global climate is changing as a result of greenhouse gases produced by human activity." "I support efforts to curb the devastating effect that human-made carbon dioxide and other greenhouse emissions have on our environment." My take: I am very much not impressed with Rick Larsen because of his positions on the Navy (they can do no wrong) and the coal port (even if it kills us, it will bring jobs). But Mr Guillot is your classic libertarian tech geek who thinks we can tech our way out of  climate change (nuclear? Please.), that we can run a government without money (reduce the debt is code for cutting taxes), and that regulations stifle industry so do away with them. No thanks. There’s a reason for those regulations, as we see with Wall Street and the banking industry. Both these candidates ran in the primary, so check back on my post about them then. Much as I hate having to vote for the lesser evil, I will be holding my nose and voting for Rick Larsen.

State Representatives

District 10, position 1

Norma Smith, R

Candidate’s statement:

Elected Experience: WA State Representative 10th District, 2008-Present; Member South Whidbey School Board 1991-1995; President, South Whidbey School Board 1994

Other Professional Experience: Awards, recognitions and endorsements by public safety groups, farming groups, employment for the disabled advocates, statewide and small business organizations, environmental stewardship advocates. Special Assistant to Congressman Jack Metcalf; Director of Operations-Global Seascapes; Director of Communications-CRISTA; Director of Programs-CRISTA Senior Community; Writer, Operations Manager-Lindsay Communications

Education: BA Theology, Puget Sound Christian College; Legislative Energy Horizon Institute Energy Policy Planning Program Graduate, 2013

Community Service: Military and Emergency Medical Services family; Church and Community Activities; Young Adult Mentor; Family Central

Statement: It is an honor to serve as your State Representative. Your stories inspire me to be a determined, effective advocate for you and the issues important to the 10th District. I believe we must treat one another respectfully, restore trust by budgeting wisely, encourage private sector job growth, provide essential services and hold government accountable to the people. I'll continue to champion limited, effective government. Preparing our students to succeed with quality education, keeping our communities safe and caring for our most vulnerable are essential priorities. I remain committed to giving you my best. I ask for your vote.

Contact:

(360) 341-5171

office@votenormasmith.com

www.votenormasmith.com has raised $75,630.23 to date (10-8-14) and spent $31,967.53

Michael Scott, Libertarian

Elected Experience: none

Other Professional Experience: Dir/Producer "On the Record" TV show; Dir/Producer "The Rising Sun"; CIO Hollywood Choppers/Chopper House; SCUBA Instructor/Special Effects; Disability Advocate-CSUN.

Education: MS computer science studies, MBA studies; BA in Film, BA of TV production; AA College of Redwoods; ROP radio broadcast, TV production, audio engineering.

Community Service: Having been a member of many fine charitable organizations; American Legion, Eagles, Moose Lodge, Habitat for Humanity, Disability Advocate-CSUN, and several others! I believe in giving where we can throughout the year, be it, St. Jude Children's Hospital, Relay for Life, or giving food to our local food bank and providing meals to those in need.

Statement: My motivation to get involved is my love for our country, state and district. I had always thought those elected to serve "We the People" did just that, serve the People. However, after hearing our community concerns I came to the realization that we are not being heard. Libertarian party believes strongly in preserving our rights and listening to the People. A big part of this is “Not” to accept corporate funding in order to gain special interests. With your support, I will serve our district, make unbiased decisions and use logic for the betterment of our community.

Contact:

(360) 631-3458

michaelscottelect@gmail.com

www.michaelscottoffice.com

No financial report on file with PDC

            I’ve known and worked with Norma Smith for years. We have very different political philosophies, but are able to come together around issues important to both of us. I’ve done a fair amount of research about Michael Scott, and find no substantive statement from him on anything, except for the one above, which is on his website, the Libertarian Party website, and the voter’s pamphlet. I believe that Libertarians live in Oz, where the basic laws of physics evidently do not apply.

            Both these candidates ran in the primary, so check my comments back then.

            I’ll be voting for Norma Smith.

District 10, position 2

Dave Hayes, R

Candidate’s statement:

Elected Experience: WA State Representative 10th District 2012 - present; President, WA Council of Police and Sheriffs; Vice President, Deputy Sheriff’s Association; Member Community Economic Revitalization Board

Other Professional Experience: Sergeant, Snohomish County Sheriff;  U.S. Navy veteran; EvCC Criminal Justice Steering Committee; Instructor, Everett Community College; WACOPS Legislator of the Year

Education: Everett Community College; WA State Criminal Justice Training Center; Jennifer Dunn Leadership Institute

Community Service: Led youth missions to Mexico and New Orleans working on habitat restoration and youth outreach projects; Active member of Camano Lutheran Church; Coached youth sports; Water association board member

Statement: Dave Hayes is making a difference--- for education, public safety, transportation improvements, and job creation. He shepherded a bipartisan effort creating thousands of jobs. Dave supported parents and local educators against bureaucrats diverting our children’s school resources. He stopped partisan gridlock to pass vital public safety legislation.

Dave’s leadership in bringing the two parties together and empowering communities continues. He supports cost effective traffic projects and transportation options, partnerships that secure new jobs and providing local schools the flexibility to innovate. Additionally, Dave will always stand with our first responders: police, firefighters, and EMS personnel, to keep us safe.

Contact:

(425) 530-0490

hayest51@gmail.com

www.electdavehayes.com

Total funds raised to date (10-8-14) $80,025.65, total spent  $48,442.94, mostly from PACs and large corporations

Nick Petrish, D

Elected Experience: Elected as Obama national delegate to the 2008 Democratic National Convention. Democratic candidate for Skagit County Commissioner 2012.

Other Professional Experience: Licensed IBEW local 191 industrial electrician. Veteran United States Army Interrogator: Croatian, Russian and Serbian cryptologic linguist.  Language instructor for DLI satellite training center Fort Lewis, Washington. Former commercial fisherman, small business owner. Professional martial arts and fire arms instructor for over 30 years.

Education: University of Washington Bachelors of Arts Political Science 1990. Defense Language Institute: Russian 1988.

Community Service: Volunteer Mathematics instructor Habitat for Humanity. McIntyre Hall fundraising board. Recipient Washington State Arts Commission Master Folk Artist Award 2006.

Statement: Nick will champion putting Washingtonians back to work by facilitating the creation of well paying and necessary jobs repairing infrastructure, expanding public transportation to rural areas, building high speed/light rail, installing optic fiber/smart grid. Smaller class rooms, funding science education, apprenticeships and technical training are priority for a prosperous and sustainable Washington State.

An independent thinker, Nick will seek cooperation to find common and creative solutions to the complex issues facing our state, while caring for the most vulnerable in our state. As a folk artist and instrument maker, Nick will promote the arts.

Contact:

(360) 941-8550

nick@nickpetrish.org

www.nickpetrish.org total contributions to date (10-8-14) $3747.50    total spent: $2361.35

I have watched Dave Hayes in action these past 4 years and am very much not impressed. The man is a cop and thinks like one. When we have presented him with straightforward environmental issues he has refused to act. Washington Conservation Voters reports that he voted against every environmental bill presented in the last year. Same goes for other broad areas. And then there’s Nick Petrish, a blast of fresh air right when and where we need it. He’s got no money so has done very little campaigning, which is too bad. I listened to him speak at a candidate night event and loved it. He’s a union man. He owns guns and supports I-594. He has a clear understanding of the climate problem and the fact that there are jobs to be had correcting it. He was right there on every point on my checklist. And he’s got a great sense of humor, along with an ability to speak convincingly to people on the polar opposite side. Both these candidates ran in the primary. Check out my comments back then. I will be voting very happily for Nick Petrish.

State Supreme Court

Justice, position 1

Mary Yu

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: Current Supreme Court Justice. Fourteen years as a trial court judge. Served as Deputy Chief of Staff to King County Prosecutor Norm Maleng and Deputy in the Civil and Criminal Divisions.

Other Professional Experience: Instructor and Distinguished Jurist in Residence, Seattle University School of Law. Director, Office for Ministry of Peace and Justice, Archdiocese of Chicago. Co-Chair, Washington State Minority and Justice Commission.

Education: B.A., Dominican University. M.A., Theology, Mundelein of Loyola University. J.D., University of Notre Dame Law School.

Community Service: Distinguished speaker on civility in the legal profession and reducing financial barriers to courts. Mentor to minority and disadvantaged students. Boardmember of FareStart.

Statement: Justice Yu joined the Supreme Court after serving for fourteen years as a highly respected Superior Court judge, where she presided over both criminal and civil cases, including hundreds of adoptions and other family law matters.

As a trial court judge, she was known for treating everyone with respect and fairness, approaching each case with an open mind, understanding that each decision a judge makes impacts someone’s life, and paying careful attention to the law.

Because of her experience, integrity, and impartiality, she has received numerous awards including “Judge of the Year” from the Washington State Association for Justice, King County Washington Women Lawyers, and the Washington State Bar Association; and “Public Official of the Year” from the Municipal League Foundation. Justice Yu received the highest possible rating - Exceptionally Well Qualified - from all six bar associations that rated her.

Justice Yu is dedicated to improving access to justice and protecting individual rights for all. She is endorsed by hundreds of current and former justices and judges, elected leaders, Washington State Patrol Troopers Association, National Women’s Political Caucus, Washington State Labor Council, Democrats, Republicans, Independents, and thousands of civic leaders, small business owners and community members across the state.

Contact:

(206) 801-3494

info@justicemaryyu.com

www.JusticeMaryYu.com

Because she is running unopposed, there is no need for a recommendation.

Justice, position 3

Mary Fairhurst

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: Supreme Court Justice, 12 years; Washington Attorney General’s Office, 16 years, specializing in revenue, transportation, criminal justice, and personnel; Supreme Court law clerk, 2 years.

Other Professional Experience: Judicial Information System Committee, Chair; Judicial Administration Public Trust and Confidence Committee, Chair; Council on Public Legal Education, Member; Washington State Bar Association, past President and Board of Governors; Washington Women Lawyers, past President.

Education: Law degree, high honors, BA with honors in Political Science, both Gonzaga University.

Community Service: State iCivics Program Chair; We the People Board Member; Thurston County Food Bank Board Member; YMCA Youth and Government volunteer; past Girl Scout Board member.

Statement: I am delighted and honored to serve you on our highest court. As a justice, I am a fierce champion of fairness and judicial independence. I respect the dignity and worth of every individual – and the guiding principles of our Constitution and laws. My role is to ensure that your rights are protected and responsibilities to our communities are upheld.

During my tenure, I've worked to enhance your trust and confidence in our judicial system. We have improved access to justice, streamlined operations, promoted technology, and made the court more efficient and transparent.

I was raised in a large, engaged family where I learned at the kitchen table, the values of open debate, honesty, and standing up for each other. I bring these values every day to the Supreme Court. I am passionate about achieving outcomes that make a difference in the lives of real people.

With your vote, I will build upon my record of fairness, impartiality, and independence. I'm proudly endorsed by over 100 current and retired judges, political and civic leaders, business and labor, law enforcement, firefighters, teachers, Democrats, Independents, Republicans and many more.

Contact:

(360) 216-7388

JusticeFairhurst@gmail.com

www.JusticeMaryFairhurst.com

Because she is running unopposed, there is no need for a recommendation.

Justice, position 4

Eddie Yoon

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: Assistant Prosecutor for Tacoma, prosecuted DUI cases. Arbitrator; Pierce County Court. Advisor on international arbitrations.

Other Professional Experience: Professor of U.S. Constitutional Law; EWHA Women's Law School - Seoul. My Supreme Court Cases: (1) against ex-presidents Chun, Do-whan, and Roh, Tae-woo for massacres in Kwang-ju City, South Korea and (2) against Japanese corporations for slavery during WWII.

Education: Lincoln High School, Tacoma 1966 - all city football player. Grays Harbor Junior College. Played football for Jack Elway. Pacific Lutheran University, 1970. University of Washington Law School, 1974. CLEO Legal Fellow.

Community Service: Pro bono work for Korean and others.

Statement: Unlike most judges, I have had real life experiences. While in college I worked in the logging camps (choker). Before becoming the first Korean-American attorney in the Northwest I also worked as a transportation agent for Northwest Airlines. Although I am currently a professor of U.S. constitutional and criminal law at the elite EWHA Women's Law School in Seoul, my wife and I lend a hand at running a small hotel owned by her family in Korea. I believe that my legal ability is evidenced by the fact that I took two cases to the U.S. Supreme Court which is unheard of for a solo attorney. As a Supreme Court Justice, I will try to continue to educate young people regarding the legal systems in Washington and the intrinsic value of our U.S. Constitution. I would be willing to travel throughout the state to do this. I also believe Supreme Court cases should be heard at cities throughout the state so that citizens know the workings of the Supreme Court. Finally, I believe a salary of $90,000.00 is enough for this job and would donate the balance ($77,505.00) to charity.

Contact:

(818) 903-1692

eddieyoon65@naver.com

Total funds raised: $0

Charles W Johnson

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: Associate Chief Justice Charles Johnson, the State Supreme Court’s most experienced member, has worked 24 years protecting individual rights, balancing the scales of justice for those less privileged, and improving court efficiency. For 15 years he taught Washington Constitutional Law at Seattle University Law School. He remains distinguished jurist in residence at the school.

Other Professional Experience: Before joining the court in 1991, Justice Johnson worked 14 years as a lawyer helping people with everyday needs.

Education: Seattle University Law School; University of Washington; Curtis High School, Tacoma.

Community Service: Washington Trails Association; Pierce County Food Bank; Pierce County Prayer Breakfast; YMCA Youth Programs.

Statement: Justice Charles Johnson understands our rights and freedoms. His 24-year record shows his commitment to individual privacy and holding government accountable. He works to deliver fair, accessible, and equal justice for all.

Lawyers’ groups rate Justice Johnson “exceptionally well qualified.” His proven experience, fairness, intellect, and impartiality are reflected by the diversity of organizations supporting his re-election, including: State Council of Fire Fighters; State Patrol Troopers; King, Pierce, and Snohomish County Democrats; Mainstream Republicans; State Labor Council; State Association of Realtors; Aerospace Machinists 751; Federation of State Employees; and other groups and individuals statewide.

The National Council on Racial and Ethnic Fairness recognized his efforts to improve justice for all persons. He received the McAulay National Legal Educator Award for lifetime dedication to integrity, compassion, courage, and professional service. He received a special commendation for improving legal services to military members.

We need Supreme Court members like Justice Johnson, with proven experience, intelligence, integrity, fairness, and impartiality. Hard work and challenges underscore his life. He worked as a laborer to pay for college and law school, and understands the value of our time and money.

A lifetime Washington resident, Justice Johnson and his wife, Dana, live in Gig Harbor.

Contact:

(253) 279-2102

charlesjohnson2014@comcast.net

www.charlesjohnsonforjustice.com

Total funds raised to date (10-8-14) $22,683.96   total spent: $6587.44

Charles Johnson has been doing a good job at the Supreme Court these last 12 years. Any candidate against him would have to have some very serious credentials. His opponent, Eddie Yoon, appears, from his interview with The Stranger, to be a bit of a buffoon. He just doesn’t come across as a serious candidate, saying that he prefers to lose so he can go back to Korea where he teaches law. Ok.

I’ll be voting for Charles Johnson

Justice, position 7

Debra L Stephens

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: Supreme Court Justice since January 2008. Statewide trial and appellate practice, including 120+ appearances before the Washington Supreme Court. Author and speaker at 100+ legal seminars. Judge of Division Three Court of Appeals before joining the Supreme Court.

Other Professional Experience: Minority and Justice Commission Member. National Courts Science Institute Advisory Board Chair. Adjunct Professor, Gonzaga Law School since 1995 (taught Constitutional Law, Community Property and Appellate Advocacy). Former community college instructor.

Education: B.A. and J.D., Gonzaga University; West Valley High, Spokane.

Community Service: Former school board director. Sacred Heart Children’s Hospital fundraising volunteer. Rotary Board member.

Statement: Since becoming a Justice in 2008, I have dedicated myself to serving the people of this state and upholding the rule of law. As the only current Justice from Eastern Washington, I bring an important perspective to the Court. As a longtime constitutional law professor, I respect legal traditions. And as a mom, former school board member, and community volunteer, I understand how court decisions impact Washington families.

Our courts are a critical branch of government, where every person – regardless of circumstance – is treated fairly, with dignity, and free from bias and politics. I work every day to maintain the independence of our judiciary, and trust the people of Washington to elect judges who support our values and respect the law.

I am proud to have support of people across the state: prominent leaders in government, education, and business; law enforcement, firefighters, labor unions, judges, and lawyers. Rated “exceptionally well qualified,” by statewide organizations, I strive to write clear opinions that uphold our values and build trust in the integrity of our justice system. I ask for the opportunity to serve you for another 6 years, and appreciate your vote.

Contact:

(360) 313-6913

JusticeDebraStephens@gmail.com

www.JusticeDebraStephens.com

Total raised to date (10-8-14) $68,008.34   total spent: $35,227.61

John (Zamboni) Scannell

Candidate’s statement:

Legal/Judicial Experience: John Scannell organized and filed a class action lawsuit which won millions of dollars for City of Seattle employees. He blocked/delayed the building of sports stadiums by challenging their public financing. He was elected employee representative by the City of Seattle employees on the Civil Service Commission.

Other Professional Experience: No information submitted

Education: Graduated with honors at Renton High School. Graduated with honors University of Washington with major in Physics, minor in mathematics Became the second person to complete the State of Washington Law Clerk program in the minimum of four years

Community Service: Performed pro bono legal work for low income clients and prisoners.

Statement: Zamboni John Scannell has been one of the few attorneys in the State that has actively been supporting the American Bar Associations long standing criticism of the Washington attorney disciplinary system. He has filed a federal RICO lawsuit citing the problems the Washington State Bar Association has created by administering the system.

The Washington State Supreme Court is in charge of the system, but the court has come under sharp criticism for 40 years for its practice of delegating its responsibility to the Washington State Bar Association. The ABA rightly likens this to the practice of putting the fox in charge of the henhouse, with Washington being one of the few state that still continue this practice.

The practice of putting a politically elected bar leadership in charge of attorney discipline has resulted in low charging rates, discipline directed at attorney who represent unpopular clients, as well as discipline directed at minority attorneys in disproportionate numbers. John Scannell appears to be the only candidate that advocates taking the bar association out of the disciplinary process.

Scannell will protect the rights of Washington citizens with decisions that are intelligent, just and ethical.

Contact:

(206) 624-3685

zamboni_john@hotmail.com

www.actionlaw.net no campaign information has been filed with PDC

Wow. This one is a hot potato. It seems that Mr Zamboni Scannell  was the subject of a court disciplinary action – authored by justice Debra Stephens. The man appears to be a crusader for the underdog, which is a good thing. But he seems to cut corners in the process. Since he’s been disbarred, I’m not sure how he can serve as a supreme court justice. His primary issue (of course) is reforming the attorney discipline rules. Meanwhile, Justice Stephens has been doing a good job. I see no reason to replace her.

I’ll be voting for Debra Stephens.