WA state governor
√ Jay Inslee, D (currently
US representative) focus on
~ economy. He fought bank deregulation and the bailout. He
wanted relief for bank mortgage victims.
~ clean energy. He’s an expert and has proposed a detailed
economic plan for new clean energy industries, which will create jobs.
~ education. supports increased innovation in the classroom
and smaller class size. He knows education = jobs, so wants to increase
emphasis on science, tech, and math.
~ equality. strong supporter of equality and civil rights,
gay marriage.
~ choice. strong supporter of women’s right to choose,
continued funding for Planned Parenthood, and full access to reproductive
services.
~ environment.
he’s a recognized environmental champion, endorsed by conservation
organizations.
~ transportation. he recognizes that transportation is more
than cars and freeways. He’s working toward “a connected multi-modal,
well-maintained transportation system that maximizes our ability to move people
and goods.”
~ veterans. leader in pursuing health and economic security
for WA veterans, particularly in training and jobs.
Rob McKenna, R
(currently AG) appealed Obamacare to the Supreme Court. Says he’ll
create jobs by ‘reducing government interference’ (you know, enabling the ‘job creators’). Says education will
be improved via competition, innovation, and charter schools (read:
privatization); wants to break teachers’ unions (again, read: privatization). He
wants to outsource government functions, create public v private competition,
and break staff unions. Are we beginning to catch a theme of union busting
here? He wants to ‘reduce lawsuit
abuse’, which translates into slamming the courthouse door on people who have
been harmed, and to shrink government
through attrition. This does raise a question about who is going to do the
work. He’ll save $ on state health care costs by shrinking or doing away with
Basic Health. He doesn’t say what happens to the poor people who lose coverage.
He’ll privatize Labor & Industries (disability) insurance, and push for
tort reform (limits on corporate liability). Yowza! This is our very own local
Romney.
WA Lieutenant Governor (serves as
president of the state Senate)
√ Brad Owen, D incumbent,
top priority is to stimulate the economy & create jobs,
help WA business increase its share of world markets. He’s a former rock
musician who uses his talents in his personal campaign of substance abuse prevention, bullying
prevention, and promotion of child
welfare. We’ve heard very little, either good or bad about him while in office,
which the Tacoma News-Tribune says is an indication that he is doing his job
well, and has been doing so for 16 years. He has spent a lot of time as a trade
ambassador to other countries, which opponent Finkbeiner says is inappropriate.
He says he’s courting trade and has made significant contributions to
Washington’s economy at little or no cost to taxpayers. Progressive Voter
reports that he sides with Tim Eyman on tax issues. He says he’s non-partisan,
working with labor and business to create new jobs. He declares that he will
run a positive campaign (no mudslinging).
Bill Finkbeiner, R, proposes to break partisan
gridlock by reducing the number of staff and limiting the influence of lobbyists.
He says he wants to ‘remove the aisle’ and make Senators sit wherever. Is this
really going to make them talk to each other or agree on issues? He says he’ll
act as a mediator to settle differences. Sounds good, but his history in the
legislature is as a solid R. Can he be expected to mediate in good faith? He’s
endorsed by Progressive Voter, and looking at his platform I can see why. It
sounds really good - until you figure out what that means. He wants to make
sure the legislature does not borrow more money than it can repay. Yes, of
course. But what does that mean in the real world? He rags on Brad Owen for
“world travel.” It seems that Mr Finkbeiner is trying to downplay a fair amount
of political baggage, including trying to stop and/or slow the final
ratification of Christine Gregoire as governor. Seattle Times says he was
engaging in “a season of cheap shots.”
Marianne, I only take issue with your support of Brad Owen over Bill Finkbeiner.
ReplyDeleteFinbeiner went against the majority of his party in supporting same-sex marriage legislation--no small feat I think to challenge the state republican party in that way.
Also Bill has come out in favor of women's rights, again not seeming to be a party line Republican.
I've heard that Brad Owen, though I'm sure has some good points, has largely hampered efforts to overturn Tim Eyman's initiatives. To me, he really seems more like the more "business as usual" of the two.